Opinion
Jan Mitchell replies to Oregonian editorial
by Jan Mitchell

To the Editorial Board,
The language used by The Oregonian in its editorial supporting the Bradwood Landing LNG Project was interesting to say the least. In my view, it created false impressions, offered false choices and may in fact have revealed a too-cozy relationship between the newspaper and the people pushing the LNG development.
To begin with, The Oregonian pleaded for “fair treatment” for the project. Implying what? Is there any hint that it has been treated unfairly? By whom? In fact, the Texas speculators behind Bradwood LNG have used large sums of money, legal muscle and experts-for-hire to exert a great deal of control over the process.
The paper describes opponents of the Bradwood LNG development as “increasingly strident.” Strident means shrill, grating, excessive and harsh. Is that how you see us, the Oregonians who live in the area and believe this charging Goliath will trample a precious and irreplaceable part of Oregon simply to line its own pockets?
We have certainly felt like the David in this situation. The money we can raise in our small community is a pittance compared to what the Bradwood speculators have been brandishing. They and their collaborators at Northwest Natural have the staff, the lawyers, the influence and apparently the ear of The Oregonian editorial board. No editorial board member has ever discussed the issue with any one of us.
What we have in abundance is community support and determination to protect this beautiful, thriving natural home of ours. With two LNG developments proposed here, there have been many, many public meetings. We all attend, again and again, so that absence will not be taken for acquiescence.
More than two-thirds of the people who testify oppose the projects. Most of those who do speak in favor are not from here. And many are the same people or organizations who spoke several years ago in support of the ship-breaking scheme that was proposed for Tongue Point. That ecologically odious project waved the same banners as Bradwood – promises of big jobs and big tax revenues. And like Bradwood it was motivated by plans for a huge payoff for people we’d never heard of before or since.
I missed any acknowledgement in your editorial of the conclusion by the Oregon Department of Energy that LNG is not the right way to meet Oregon’s energy needs. The state’s energy experts maintain that natural gas from the Rockies will be cheaper and cleaner.
I missed any mention of the gaping flaws in FERC’s environmental impact assessment which shrugs at all the work that has been done and all the public money than has been spent to restore and protect the Columbia River Estuary and its habitat.
I missed any concern that increasing our dependence on foreign fossil fuels will bleed away still more of our national treasure and make our country less secure and less able to deal with crisis. It’s no secret that much of this LNG comes from the very same places that are gorging now on the money we pay for oil. Who would you prefer to have in charge of our energy future? Algeria? Qatar? Brunei? Libya? Oman? The United Arab Emirates? Abu Dhabi? Russia? Iran?
I missed any evidence behind your offhanded dismissal of the potential of conservation and renewable energy sources. I don’t recall any in depth analysis in the Oregonian of this country’s present and future energy needs and the relative merits of different approaches. Frankly, I think you pulled this assertion out of your hat.
We have had plenty of opportunity during this struggle to read the brochures and ads produced by the Bradwood forces. I was truly disappointed in The Oregonian for how closely your editorial followed the talking points in these flack pieces.
Jan Mitchell
Astoria
Local Blog Posts
Opinion Links
Recent Comments
Notice: No cry for foreign LNG and its pipeline.
Natural gas is our country’s second largest energy resource and a vital component of our energy supply. 98% of …
LOL, yes, Patrick I know the phrase. I was poking the point that this horse was beaten to death and it was ressurected to get killed over and over like …
By Rick Balkins from the article Where are you getting 4-131 info?.On Sep 5, 6:31 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
Anyway, I voted how I feel about the issue whether you agree or disagree with me, I’m not going to …
By Patrick McGee from the article Where are you getting 4-131 info?.Who’s truths or lies are you believing is the nature of this question.
I believe from my standpoint that LNG might be good but I’d be interested in …
By Rick Balkins from the article Where are you getting 4-131 info?.I get mine from “Clatsop County”, “The Daily Astorian”, “KAST Coastwatch","Peter Huhtala” and of course, “Grass Roots People”.
What convinced me to vote the way I did?
… By Patrick McGee from the article Where are you getting 4-131 info?.
33 Comments
On Jul 18, 8:13 PM, Ron wrote:
No one has spoke to you? Would you ever listen? I don’t think much of the Oregonian but they were right on this one. Full speed ahead.
On Jul 19, 11:25 AM, AnotherAstorian wrote:
It may be that there was a 2/3rd’s majority of testimony against Bradwood AT the public hearings, but the primary reason for that is because the majority of citizens have full time jobs and were unable to get away - nobody seems to mention the hundreds and hundreds of letters and cards that were submitted in favor, by people who couldn’t make it in person.
And I’d like to know where she gets the idea that most of the people who were there in favor weren’t from around here? That’s ridiculous. On that subject, Jan must not have been at that meeting where several agencies came together to allow public comment, and close to half of the people who spoke against live down around Forest Grove and such. THAT meeting was a joke to say the least, the agencies let the opposition walk all over them and took control of the meeting. Anyone who was there may remember that.
And finally, the statement “In fact, the Texas speculators behind Bradwood LNG have used large sums of money, legal muscle and experts-for-hire to exert a great deal of control over the process.” is just ridiculous...yes, they have spent alot of money with consultants and experts, to make sure that everything is done correctly; that doesn’t constitute “control” of anything. Luckily, most of our county and state regulations allow approval of something ONLY if specific criteria are met - the company enlists the assistance of experts in every aspect of the process because they don’t want to risk missing a single thing. She borders on accusing them of buying their way thru the process.
I also applaud the Oregonian for their editorial...someone finally making some sense!
On Jul 19, 6:41 PM, Oregonian makes sense, sometimes wrote:
Speculators have filed applications to develop more than 1 million acres of desert in Southern California with solar, wind and geothermal power plants, setting up a classic clash over land use with environmentalists and off-road enthusiasts.
American speculators are pouring cash into start-up technology firms seeking environmental solutions - and big dividends
The Importance of Forward REC Markets in Renewable Energy Finance
In addition, creating a stable forward market allows market speculators to enter into the marketplace. As speculators enter the marketplace, there are more potential buyers and sellers of RECs at any given time, enhancing liquidity. Once a marketplace becomes more liquid, participants become more confident in both the viability of the market and price stability.
In short, speculators use money they don’t have to buy something they’ll never get. - Byron Dorgan
Speculators play a vital role in their proper function. This role has never been more apparent than in this new era of electronic trading. That is because the markets are now open to anyone who can afford the risk. Without speculators, there would be no penny-wide markets in equities.
<i>The harangue re “speculators” is just another buzz word being tried to give people a false picture of who is backing a project. Nowadays, you speculate when you buy fruit from Costco, you speculate when you purchase something from craigslist, you speculate when you cross the road. It’s the dumb speculators you have to look out for. So WHAT if some one is speculating?”
On Jul 20, 1:48 AM, Jennie F. Decker wrote:
Jan Mitchell replies
...We have certainly felt like the David...We raise in our small community is a pittance.... No editorial board member has ever discussed the issue with any one of us....
...What we have in abundance is community support and determination to protect this beautiful, thriving natural home of ours… With two LNG developments proposed here, there have been many, many public meetings. We all attend...
Oh go back to California, you shrill sniviling whining little twit. And, please, take your we and your us with you.
On Jul 20, 8:22 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
On Jul 19, 5:41 PM, Oregonian makes sense, sometimes wrote:
Speculators have filed applications to develop more than 1 million acres of desert in Southern California with solar, wind and geothermal power plants, setting up a classic clash over land use with environmentalists and off-road enthusiasts.
American speculators are pouring cash into start-up technology firms seeking environmental solutions - and big dividends
The Importance of Forward REC Markets in Renewable Energy Finance
In addition, creating a stable forward market allows market speculators to enter into the marketplace. As speculators enter the marketplace, there are more potential buyers and sellers of RECs at any given time, enhancing liquidity. Once a marketplace becomes more liquid, participants become more confident in both the viability of the market and price stability.
In short, speculators use money they don’t have to buy something they’ll never get. - Byron Dorgan
Speculators play a vital role in their proper function. This role has never been more apparent than in this new era of electronic trading. That is because the markets are now open to anyone who can afford the risk. Without speculators, there would be no penny-wide markets in equities.
<i>The harangue re “speculators” is just another buzz word being tried to give people a false picture of who is backing a project. Nowadays, you speculate when you buy fruit from Costco, you speculate when you purchase something from craigslist, you speculate when you cross the road. It’s the dumb speculators you have to look out for. So WHAT if some one is speculating?”
Hey!
Nobody said all “Speculators” are “Dirt Bags”
“Speculator"(n): One who invests capitol at high risk in return for potential large profit.
On Jul 20, 10:06 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
On Jul 20, 12:48 AM, Jennie F. Decker wrote:
Jan Mitchell replies
...We have certainly felt like the David...We raise in our small community is a pittance.... No editorial board member has ever discussed the issue with any one of us....
...What we have in abundance is community support and determination to protect this beautiful, thriving natural home of ours… With two LNG developments proposed here, there have been many, many public meetings. We all attend…
Oh go back to California, you shrill sniviling whining little twit. And, please, take your we and your us with you.
Put it to a vote if you want a true answer.
Your sole opinion is not going to cut it and Ms. Mitchell has been in the middle of this LNG frey since day one and I would certainly put a lot more faith and qualification in her opinion than yours but, that’s just me.
On Jul 20, 10:02 PM, Guest wrote:
Why is it the outsiders always squwalk louder than the locals. May be the locals are now out numbered by the California transplants. Why do you out of state invaders have absolutely no respect for the life long residents here who want LNG, and all that comes with it.
On Jul 20, 10:04 PM, the voice of Cape Falcon wrote:
On Jul 20, 9:06 AM, Patrick McGee wrote: Mit chell has been in the middle of this LNG frey since day one and I would certainly put a lot more faith and qualification in her opinion than yours,,,
Well, McGee, as much as I see you posting around the various boards and blogs it would be safe to say that there flat just isnt many people in the local area who take you seriously or consider you some sort of voice of authority on local issues. As far asthis...this...Mitchell woman, whoever she is or thinks she is, she’s just another transplanted California know it all trying to impress people with her selfish and outsider driven agenda. Both of you are insignificant voices who garner little attention but put great value on your own opinions. Most of the locals consider you as Seagulls. You know about Seagulls, dont you flatlander? Seagulls really dont do much around here but shit and squawk.
On Jul 21, 8:47 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
On Jul 20, 9:04 PM, the voice of Cape Falcon wrote:
On Jul 20, 9:06 AM, Patrick McGee wrote: Mit chell has been in the middle of this LNG frey since day one and I would certainly put a lot more faith and qualification in her opinion than yours,,,
Well, McGee, as much as I see you posting around the various boards and blogs it would be safe to say that there flat just isnt many people in the local area who take you seriously or consider you some sort of voice of authority on local issues. As far asthis...this...Mitchell woman, whoever she is or thinks she is, she’s just another transplanted California know it all trying to impress people with her selfish and outsider driven agenda. Both of you are insignificant voices who garner little attention but put great value on your own opinions. Most of the locals consider you as Seagulls. You know about Seagulls, dont you flatlander? Seagulls really dont do much around here but shit and squawk.
Well, the voices must be significant enough for you to respond to them even though with the predictably virtiolic drivel so common on this site now as opposed to constructive discussion on issues but hey, we all have a right to our view.
On Jul 21, 10:40 AM, frightened consumer wrote:
Grow up Patrick, and quit showing your jealousy. The only time vitriolic drivel occurs is when someone is responding to one of your attacks. Stay on point and constructive or accept what is coming to you like an adult.
There is not one person who speaks for all of us, nor even a majority of us. The majority of us haven’t spoken because we honestly don’t know. We do know both sides exaggerate their points. The side that is going to “win” is the side the presents the best economic gain. You can promote the heck out of blue skies and clear waters when the economy is good. When it is crappy and most of us are putting half of our paycheck into our mortgage and the other half into the gas tank so we can get to work to pay the storage you have angry & frightened people who really don’t give a gd about whether or not the skies are blue, especially if it is overcast all the time.
On Jul 21, 10:48 AM, Submit A Comment wrote:
I cant help but wonder where this town and other areas of the county would be had this California Mitchell person and her ilk been present the past 150 years when the things we consider important historical landmarks and economic boons in our county were concieved and put into operation?
“No, we don’t want jettys and dredging-it’s ugly.” Or, “we must not allow a sprawling military defense and housing complex to be built at the river mouth and Tounge Point because it’s ugly”. “We think defacing the Astoria river front with fish cannerys, flour mills, grain elevators, lumber mills, warehouses and shipyards so people can produce things just so they can be part of the national and world economy is unnecessary and we dont like it.” “We dont want anyone harvesting the trees and ocean resources because we just moved here from California and we arent dependent on wage jobs to support ourselves.” “We dont think Waunna mill should be built because it smells, is unsightly and it’s all about greedy people who just want money.”
On Jul 21, 11:08 AM, Name (required wrote:
On Jul 20, 9:06 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
Put it to a vote if you want a true answer.
Was the existence of Waunna Mill put to a vote when it was proposed? Was that ugly ass retail complex thrown up on a former mudflat on Young’s Bay including Payless, Freddys and Costco voted on? How about that goddamn ugliest of the uglies Home Depot? I about puke when I get close to that temple of retail overkill. How about we put to a vote the possibility of getting people to stop moving here so these big time corporate retail outlets wont have the population base to capitalize on?
On Jul 21, 12:01 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
Those darned Californians, how dare they come up here and taint this lovely place in which we live with their big ideas!......Capt. George Flavel, who came west for the California gold rush in 1849 and was lured north when issued a license by the Oregon territorial government as a pilot on the Columbia River Bar. He became Astoria’s first millionaire and amassed large chunks of local property, some of which the family still owns.
On Jul 21, 12:05 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
History lesson about Astoria. Until about the 1980s, tourism was not the element. Astoria was just like any other town like Portland, St. Helens, or any other town.
HISTORIC buildings were NOT the pivotal point. However, using existing and historic buildings were part of life. Simply because the building is beautiful.
We weren’t SO concern about the view provided the buildings were not over a certain height. The height of buildings in zoning was calculated based on topography maps and average building heights.
On average, people were concern about jobs and economics. People were more balanced thinking. Part of the trouble with some of the “mom & pop” groceries was the advent of supermarket and one-stop shopping. Essentially, “malling”. Then again, corporations win because they have better prices. People go where it costs them the least.
Simple. Culture change rendered certain types of businesses out-of-business. Answer: Adapt by changing to a new niche market.
However, we can’t live on tourism alone. We need a viable, sustainable and non-tourism based economy that will pay the baseline expenditures so we a viable - regardless of the swings of the tourism market.
In the days, there was significant theater, fishing, auto-repair and contractors markets. Astoria was vieing to be the New York of the West Coast in these early days.
Now, we quit being that. We have shortsighted ourselves and meandered around and talk, talk, talk. Too many people move in without ANY practical experience such as “don’t let opportunity pass you by” because you get too many neuvo riche folks who got there money like a gift or they got there money from inheritance so they don’t work and just play through life. Acting that they are SOOO important. As if they are the “GOD’S GIVEN gift to the World”. Arrogance. Then we have so much of this, and missed opportunity after opportunity. All of which are ruining lifes of so many people over time. Not giving these people opportunities to make something of there lives. Causing so many divorces and cause of criminals. If they can’t make it anywhere the “legal” way, they might as well do it by not-so-legal ways. How else do you make your way in life. There is a causes for desperation.
How do we answer the real problems sensibly.
Answer: Stop thinking about just yourselves and think about others as a whole.
Do we need a bigger jail. No. Solve the issues with crimes by making ways for opportunities for these people to make a living in legal ways. If we are not going to give opportunities, then we ought to shoot them and end the misery and the cost of giving them free room and board.
Some deserve death. Some don’t. We have so many issues but we made that mess.
On Jul 21, 1:42 PM, Flavel Flav wrote:
On Jul 21, 11:01 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
Those darned Californians, how dare they come up here and taint this lovely place in which we live with their big ideas!......Capt. George Flavel...
Flavel might be some romantic hero to you, Mcgee, but to his contemporaries he was generally regarded as a blood sucking monopolist.....
On Jul 21, 11:05 AM, Rick Balkins wrote:
History lesson about Astoria....
Unless I am mistaken isnt this historian, Mr. Balkins, a youngish fellow recently arrived from, dare I say, California?
On Jul 21, 2:21 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
Flavel Flav wrote: Unless I am mistaken isnt this historian, Mr. Balkins, a youngish fellow recently arrived from, dare I say, California?
Another outsider making a valid contribution to you natives and life quality in “OUR” community.
You?
What do you do here besides boldly hide behind anonymity?
On Jul 21, 3:01 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
Flavel Flav:
It isn’t the State in which you come from that means anything.
Unlike many people who move from OTHER states, I have studied a bit on the history of Astoria. Astoria was like any town on the frontier. Fishing, Logging, ect. It wasn’t about being a history theme park.
Homes were built for practical and in cases, to personal lavishness.
Some people forget that Astoria was most importantly, a town not a theme park. Certainly, tourism is important in these days for Astoria but things diminish when people coming here because it is some centiennial (bicentinneal) celebration that they’ll stop coming every year. Thus, reducing the numbers per year.
A side note, I don’t particularly agree with Jan Mitchell in everything said or anyone else’s words.
In a matter of a year or two, I would have been living in Astoria for a longer period of time then I have lived in California. I call it home. Sure it isn’t where I was born. Sure it isn’t the big city. Which isn’t all what the movie industry portrays it to be. In fact, not all those ideas will work here or even desired to be here.
Keep in mind that I been living at this place of residence and town of Astoria longer then the previous city/residence I lived at prior to. For a little bit about myself, I was born in Santa Monica, California. Then of course, after leaving the hospital as usual for birth, was living in West Los Angeles area until about 2-3 years old. Then moved Carson, California. Lived there until about the summer of 1995. Then lived here since.
I work as a building designer. Keep this in mind that some of you may have moved in from other States but that doesn’t make you better then Californians NOR does moving in from California makes you better then anyone that has moved in from other States. Even having lived in Oregon, all your life still doesn’t mean you have studied the history of your community. Even forgetting about the community as well.
Now, you talk about Captain George Flavel. Lets remember that the Flavels had alot of ties with San Francisco. Geez, I think I misspelled that California city. Guess, I been living out of California long enough.
Back from a little bit of sarcasm about statements about Californian and my own misspelling. Since we all live here, learning about a particular person in Astoria’s history or select few still doesn’t make you know everything about Astoria. Even some born and raised Astorians don’t know everything about Astoria. Noone does. From what I read about this community, it was at one time - the largest city in Oregon. Then for some time, it was the second largest city in Oregon, behind Portland. Back in the days of John E. Wicks - architect, the Astoria National Bank - IIRC since there was two which is so closely named. One is currently the City Hall and the other the Banker’s Suite. I’m talking about the Banker’s Suite. This bank was the largest bank in Oregon outside of the Portland area when it was built.
A little bit of history, eh. Point was, Astoria wasn’t SO concern about the view (not to mean the view was unimportant) but about the economic status of the community and economic stronhold.
Our economy when down the tubes in the 1960s and 1970s and so on. This all began when several things occured. One was when the Navy left the Tongue Point station. Another was the dredging of a channel to allow ships to dock in Portland directly. This rendered our shipping industry to nill. Why, the obvious should tell you. If the ship can reach Portland, they’ll go straight to Portland and use the warehouses and train hub. Portland had an major airport, main artery hub for trucking and cargo trains. Additionally, it was a larer city with larger ppulation. Hence, larger workforce.
Astoria was hanging on since the 20s until the 60s and 70s because large ships couldn’t make it to Portland and Astoria had the market being the deep water port.
Then the environmentalist movement push in the 60s, 70s, and 80s and increasing regulations had squeezed down on the lumber industry and fishing industry. Not to mention, fish supply and tree supply was progressively shrinking. All of which took its toll.
However, despite all of this, Astoria in particular still had a large inventory asset of existing/historic buildings. A glimpse to the past as big citys were progressively loosing their historic structures to make room for new malls, skyscrapers, ect. Astoria still has that asset and tourism industry began to grow. While we retain this. Other cities lost that and began to look more and more like cookie cutter houses and glass box buildings.
I think in a short summary, it is a short overview of the major aspects of Astoria. Not the personal and family matters so much.
All of this shapes this community. A community that I call home for me. For what its worth, just because someone comes from California doesn’t mean anything. I rather look at things as urban to rural culture. Anyone that comes from another place will have different perspectives that they may bring into things. It is good to have fresh blood and ideas. A note to people moving in, don’t be arrogant and speak as if you are some god given gift and savior. Take time to know and learn about the community somewhat reasonable.
There is alot of matters and issues in the community. Some going for decades.
This covers what I need to say. I don’t particularly side with Jan Mitchell or Patrick McGee. I am rather neutral on this LNG issue for the most part. I see benefits and flaws. It is just a matter of how to decide.
The Daily Astorian is biased and so is the Oregonian in the opposite stance. At least from what I was gathering.
All in all, there is alot of bantering. I live in this community and call it home and have a stake in the matters as everyone else.
This is where I stand. To a degree, I would be offended by remarks about Calfornians just because of some of them were jerks. It is also reasonable for me to understand that there was a history of some folks. Just bear with me and understand me as well as for me to understand you. It is just one contention that I have.
Thank You for bearing through this message and take note of understnding where I come from.
On Jul 21, 6:36 PM, Miller Sands wrote:
On Jul 21, 2:01 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
Astoria was hanging on since the 20s until the 60s and 70s because large ships couldn’t make it to Portland and Astoria had the market being the deep water port...... the dredging of a channel to allow ships to dock in Portland directly. This rendered our shipping industry to nill. Why, the obvious should tell you. If the ship can reach Portland, they’ll go straight to Portland and use the warehouses and train hub. Portland had an major airport, main artery hub for trucking and cargo trains. Additionally, it was a larer city with larger ppulation. Hence, larger workforce.
Oh brother. Where in the heck do you get this crap? I find it a particularly fascinating bit of so called fact that deep draft vessels didnt get to Portland unitl the 1960s-70s. That’s good. You’re a real historian there, Mr. Balkins, but you might want to do some further research or at least talk to someone who knows something about the real history of maritime commerce on the Columbia before you go spreading anymore of this type of misinformation lest some unfortunate soul mistake you for someone who actually has any idea of what he’s talking about.
On Jul 21, 7:55 PM, rick balkins wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Columbia_River
“[edit] Opening the passage to Lewiston
As early as 1881, industrialists proposed altering the natural channel of the Columbia to improve navigation.[34] Changes to the river over the years have included the construction of jetties at the river’s mouth, dredging, and the construction of canals and navigation locks. Today, ocean freighters can travel upriver as far as Portland and Vancouver, and barges can reach as far inland as Lewiston, Idaho.[13]
The Columbia Bar, a shifting sandbar at the mouth of the river, makes passage between the river and the Pacific Ocean difficult and dangerous, and numerous rapids along the river hinder navigation. Jetties, first constructed in 1886,[34] extend the river’s channel into the ocean. Strong currents and the shifting sandbar remain a threat to ships entering the river and necessitate continuous maintenance of the jetties.
In 1891 the Columbia was dredged to enhance shipping. The channel between the ocean and Portland and Vancouver was deepened from 17 feet (5.2 m) to 25 feet (7.6 m) The Columbian newspaper called for the channel to be deepened to 40 feet (12 m) as early as 1905, but that depth was not attained until 1976.[38]
Navigation locks were first constructed in 1896 around the Cascades Rapids,[39] enabling boats to travel safely through the Columbia River Gorge.[40] The Celilo Canal, bypassing Celilo Falls, opened to river traffic in 1915.[41] In the mid-20th century, the construction of dams along the length of the river submerged the rapids beneath a series of reservoirs. An extensive system of locks allowed ships and barges to pass easily from one reservoir to the next. A navigation channel reaching to Lewiston, Idaho, along the Columbia and Snake Rivers, was completed in 1975.[34] One of the main commodities is wheat, mainly for export. More than 40 percent of all US wheat exports are barged on the Columbia River.[42]
The 1980 eruption of Mount St. Helens caused mudslides in the area, which reduced the Columbia’s depth by 25 feet (7.6 m) for a 4-mile (6.4 km) stretch, disrupting Portland’s economy.[43]”
Take a moment and read.
Another source of information:
http://www.usace.army.mil/publications/misc/un24/c-5.pdf
It is interesting to read and considering technical feat of the Jetty and channel dredgings over the years, Astoria was ahead of the game. Ships that could make it to Portland, did still go straight to Portland as with why stop here and unload the ship and load a train or bunch of trucks if much of it was going to Portland, anyway.
Portland, had plenty of other factors helping it out in growth based on location.
I think I was referring to the largest of ships.
It seems to me that the Astoria area was very quickly to achieving the 30 and then 40-ft depths. We were just ahead of the game if you say in regards to channel depth.
On Jul 21, 8:25 PM, local who likes the "foreigners" wrote:
We really had a double whammy hit when we lost the Navy and within twenty years lost Bumble Seafood, too. Madigan got the hospital, they lobbied harder. Most probably the people back then felt that with the economy of the Navy, the fishing canaries and logging behind us we really didn’t have to fight tooth and nail for the port. Which was “our” bad. Economic Diversity, even with three “industries” look what happened KERBLOOM by the mid 70s, a HUGE shift in the way of life around here. Next, we tried drugs. That’s been pretty stable, ask all the 60 year old dealers. They’re still not touched by the local cops, they just keep rounding up the small guys and playing like they care about this “war on drugs” means something other than some fat paycheck in their back pocket.
We CANNOT, MUST NOT and WELL NOT, become the bedroom-retirement community for anyone, whether it be Californians (bless their leather skin) nor Portland or Seattle (bless their SUVs trekking down here hauling their George Loomis sport fishing boats). The more service industries their are the more drugs there are. They go hand in hand. Low pay for long hours and little reward or forward mobility. STUPID idea. The more tourism, the more the DA & Sheriff get to use their favorite motto, “Come on vacation, leave on probation” and drug use goes up, up, up.
Anyone can BECOME a Clatsopian, if they want to embrace the whole darn county, not just the bits and pieces they want to change into San Francisco or Eugene. Work WITH us, not against us. Quit talking as if letters behind your name mean jack-diddly-squat or that YOU know what land or sea conservation means over those of us who have lived with this nature, right here, for generations. Spotted owls SLEEP IN OUR STICKER BUSHES, not just in old growth. The butterflies will make it. The f***king fish have never spawned off of Leahy’s land at Bradwood Landing. The cruise ships do more damage than the LNG tankers ever will to our “precious nurseries”. Hell, every ship except the LNG tankers that go up the river will do worse than the LNG tankers!!!
I appreciate Balkin doing some research. Just remember to also listen to locals. Even if some of us get it partially “wrong,” it is the history we grew up on, it is the culture we were taught. You are expected to at least acknowledge it, much like knowing the tune to ring around the rosy whether or not you knew you were singing about the signs of death.
On Jul 21, 9:30 PM, Guest wrote:
Refreshing to see the Oregonian do an article that gives a positive view. If Ms. Mitchell had to go to work everyday, feed four kids, and hope she has enough for the rent she wouldn’t be against lower energy prices and jobs...must be nice to make yours somewhere else and sell what you had for tons more than you paid and come here and watch the poor pitiful rest of us try to feed ourselves, and teach our kids there’s a future here...getting tougher when folks like her don’t give a damn about our school numbers declining, if this project doesn’t go, just shut down the Columbia for Clatsop County...can’t believe the locals will let her and her red shirts win this one. The fact that McGee trusts her opinion is enough of a reason to support this industry. Wonder how you get smarter and better than everybody else, maybe it’s a class she could teach at the college.
On Jul 21, 9:32 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
I totally agree. I understand and acknowledge (whether I type it or not) that this is the history that the community is taught.
I just wanted to make a reminder that there those of us who tries to become part of the community and not always the arrogant folks. Some of those, moving here because they got some job position because they just wanted to escape the zoo they were living in.
It also takes time to accept that for some. In my opinion, much of the stuff that works in places like Los Angeles won’t work here and simply not right here. Sometimes it is good to bring ideas but part of that responsibility is to listen to your community you live in, work with and present ideas. For me, my skill set and experience is in building design (architecture if you like to call it). I look beyond this community for inspiration but it is up to this community not a singular “I”. Lets remember that many long-time members of this community are either born in Sweden/Finland/Norway,ect. area and moved here either when young or WERE sons and daughters born here. Such people like John E. Wicks (John [not sure of the Finnish spelling] Erik Wiik) were born in Finland and done many wonderful things in Astoria and was strong member of this community. I prefer to follow some of the same steps that John Wicks did to be part of this community. Respect the community, maintain honesty and integrity. There are also many folks who have came to this community at multiple stages of their lives.
We all become part of the community when we are working together as peers. Not some person with some self-ordained superiority complex. We all have our areas of expertise through education and experience. This community works the greatest when we all use our education and experiences together to make things happen. A great example of that time was the rebuilding of the Astoria community after the 1922 fire.
In my opinion, I would hate to see this community lose its character to be some bedroom-retirement community or some “Santa Monica wannabe” with all the cheap condos. The tourism isn’t bad just because it is tourism. It has sustained us. We have a good theater/performing arts scene and art scene. Embrace it. Retain it. However, don’t just stop there. We need more “real jobs” that deals with unemployment or limited-employment issues with forward mobility. We also need to keep connected with the world around us in our job markets while we also retain the tourism, arts, and entertainment that makes this a good place to live. It should be a good place to live and work as well as retire and raise children. A complete and balanced community.
The above is my opinion and if we get too off-tracked then we have problems.
Thanks for the comments everyone.
On Jul 22, 4:35 PM, James G. Blaine wrote:
Califonians suck. For several resons, They haul their asses up here after fleeing L.A. with too much money collected from an over inflated housing market which gave them extra buying power in barns and ramshackle older homes in a competivie buyers market which placed them out of financial reach of our traditional homebuyers making less than these noveau riche imigrants. So, of course, they immediately cop some instant attitude that they have some roots here and by God they assume since they arent dependent on the local economic output that they somehow should dictate as to what this town needs and just what the river is for, the River has always been the economic lifeblood of the Northwest, yet these recent arrivals now have the goddamn gall to try to claim it’s there own little national scenic playground or something. Hey, individually, they might be very cool people and all that, but for not having long term connections/roots in the northwest they bring nothing but complaints and the desire to take from us what we have depended on for generations. Screw them. Wish they’d go back to California and save that place.
On Jul 22, 5:29 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
As usual on this, the discussion degenerates into shit slinging.
Definitely one thing NCO can be counted on to supply.
Oh well, on to something better.
On Jul 22, 6:02 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
FYI: I moved here when I was 14 years old from California.
I’ll ask you a simple question, what have “I” done to you or this community.
I don’t come here to “save” this community. I don’t come here with some self-ordained superiority over everyone because of where I came from. California school system sucks. I don’t want to go back to California because it is no longer home to me. In fact, California would be about as alien to me. I have memories of the place but when I do visit the area like California - I don’t want to be any part of it. I use my education and experience as would anyone in this community born and raised here would. Since California is the subject of this part of the conversation, I can tell you a little about the place if you even desire to know. However, I don’t care what happens to it. It can sink into the ocean for as much I care.
When it comes to earthquakes, I can share my stories and memories of such because I know this region does not have many “large earthquakes”. My knowledge in seismology (though not an expert) would be fundamental and helpful to people here. As for the river, to me, the river is beautiful but I don’t see it as some personal scenic playground.
When I came here, I didn’t come to “save this place”. Often that is a problem when you move here as an adult for a top job like a city engineer or some position like that. Arrogant people like that should just go back. Regardless of where they come from. Some people use their “college” education and all these letters to make them sound like some person of special authority. An expert. Then again, that is a problem for anyone with their bachelors, masters and doctorates in a profession and speak and have that attitude.
Lets remember, that they studied their science and books on subject matters but they have sometimes trouble de-gearing from being the “perfect elitist” which drove them through college to converse with average joe public. Knowledge is power. Too much power corrupts.
They get the attitude of superiority complex and look down of others.
Sadly, there was an influx of some Californians and folks from other places coming in with that attitude because they moved here for a job not a community to live as a part of. Majority of the problem stems from hiring folks from outside the community. They don’t acclimate with the community at a peer to peer level. They go around with their attitude and stating statements like, “I got my Masters degree in ___________ from UCLA or Harvard or some other university”.
They don’t have to come from California to be a jerk. Jerks comes from anywhere.
On Jul 22, 8:35 PM, Taylor Sands wrote:
n Jul 22, 4:29 PM, Patrick McGee wrote:
Oh well, on to something better.
Now you’re making some sense, McGee. Im sure the mulitudes are waiting over there on your site for your next exciting cut and paste ripped right from the pages of a couple of day old Daily Astorian
On Jul 22, 5:02 PM, Rick Balkins wrote:
FYI: I moved here when I was 14 years old from California.
I’ll ask you a simple question, what have “I” done to you or this community.
You seem like a nice and intelligent young man, Mr. Balkins. No one, certainly not me, is accusing you of doing anything. You are obviously thoughtful and respectful and not averse to humility. I hope some day to be able to meet you in person.
On Jul 23, 6:32 AM, Patrick McGee wrote:
<i>On Jul 22, 7:35 PM, Taylor Sands wrote:
Now you’re making some sense, McGee. Im sure the mulitudes are waiting over there on your site for your next exciting cut and paste ripped right from the pages of a couple of day old Daily Astorian<i>
Let’s see, there’s your drivel, this site’s drivel and then there’s......... Newspaper earns 16 state awards for stories, photos and editing.
How many awards did the “Cyber Rag” win this year?
The Daily Astorian won 16 awards, including six first-place trophies, in the annual Better Newspapers Contest of the Oregon Newspaper Publishers Association.
The awards were presented at the ONPA’s annual convention at Gleneden Beach Friday. They honored work published in 2007.
Reporter Cassandra Profita won two first-place awards. She won the educational writing category for a story about a class at Astoria High School that taught students how fish reached their plates. She also won first place in the best writing category for a portfolio of three stories. Her three-part series on the Port of Astoria’s financial troubles won second place in the enterprise reporting category.
The enterprise category was won by a package of stories and photos by Tom Bennett on his second trip to Afghanistan to cover the mission of the Oregon National Guard.
Photographer Alex Pajunas earned three awards. He won the photopage category for photos depicting people protesting the proposed liquefied natural gas plant, second place in the news photography category for a flooding photo during the December storm and third place in the sports photo category for a photo of Seaside players during a break in a soccer playoff.
Steve Forrester, editor and publisher of The Daily Astorian, won first place in editorial writing for a portfolio of three editorials.
Two staff members were honored for headline writing. Coast Weekend editor Kathleen Strecker placed first and copy editor Max Charlton placed third. Charlton also placed third for front-page design for a portfolio of his work.
Sports writer Gary Henley placed second in the sports photo category for a shot of Knappa baseball.
Patrick Webb, managing editor, placed third in the special sections category for his work coordinating the annual Lives They Lived section.
Sue Cody, deputy managing editor, placed third for best sports pages.
Reporter Kara Hansen placed third in the silk purse category for a first-person account of a U.S. Coast Guard training program. The category honors writers who take a basic-sounding assignment and make it compelling.
Summer intern Mark Brown was honored with a third-place award in the religion writing category for a story about the activities at Astoria’s First Presbyterian Church.
The Daily Astorian competes against Oregon daily newspapers with circulations under 10,000.
On Jul 23, 7:28 AM, Local or Outsider wrote:
Reading comments on LNG is troubling in the way they represent locals and outsiders. I know a lot of locals and they are very concerned about the rising cost of natural gas due to the obvious influence of LNG gas on the Global Market and the more we present a false picture of willing to pay that price we show a questionable level of reasoning. What do you think we would get? Answer a no brainer- HIGHER PRICES. What is going to happen when we take our domestic gas onto the global market that according to some is in short supply? Rising concern that this will happen sooner than later if some get their way. WOW, has that one been covered yet? I for one am very concerned about some outsiders not all. The biggest outsider is the one pushing this outrageous scheme on us with millions, I think their power out ways the sum of all the other so called outsiders (now you know what I think of outsiders as a whole).
Next, some speak of outsiders not healthy for locals, seems we agree on that one with the key difference you think they are against LNG I view their power as being the key factor supporting LNG. Hold that thought for a second as we think of all those prior comments referring to all these outsiders against LNG taking over the locals. Can you imagine more locals leaving to be an outsider some where else while outsiders come to our location taking a locals place? Would this create a higher ratio of outsider here? IN SUMMARY, many of us locals know many so called locals that are using common sense and viewing LNG for what it is, please hold your ground and do not let another outsiders take your place and give them a front row seat to pour more LNG or the equivalent on us. There are four letter words that are more appropriate for the flow of these types of schemes but we cant use them.
On Jul 23, 7:52 AM, Guest wrote:
Considering the Astorian writes fiction it is pretty amazing they won, but that’s how traditional journalism tries to bolster their failing readership. They give each other awards which mean nothing. How many awards has grass roots people won? You should get one at least for the best reprint of the articles printed in the Astorian. I’ll take the objective truth that is written here over awarded fiction and yellow journalism any day.
On Jul 23, 9:05 AM, carmel wrote:
I just wish those dam Canucks would stop sending that awful natural gas down here to Oregon where we only believe in heating with clean coal power and fish friendly hydro systems.
Take those nasty pipe lines out of here and keep that ugly gasoline away from here too. We want our oxen and goats back (only of course if they haven’t stepped foot in California during their lives).
Carmel
On Jul 23, 10:12 AM, Rick Balkins wrote:
carmel: natural gas is cleaner burning then coal can ever be. It is scientifically impossible for coal as it is to yield more energy with less energy going into the process of extracting the energy. The energy, therefore is in the application of heat. Natural sas also has a smaller carbon footprint then coal. Even LNG from foreign sources is better then the most cleanest coal power.
This statement is not intended to promote LNG but a statement about coal. Current “real” LNG power generaors provide better energy output then the scientific “ideal” coal generator. Since everything is less then ideal in reality. Coal just doesn’t yield energy all that effective. It would be good for Mars because the difference of planets means practices that are not so good on earth would be great to kickstarting Mars because its too cold to susy\tain life in a natural way so it needs more carbon footprint.
Interesting considering I saw this program last night about NASA plans going to Mars in the upcoming decades and return to the moon. The science behind it.
On Jul 23, 2:15 PM, Joe wrote:
I do believe carmel was speaking with tongue firmly planted in cheek.
Rick does make good points, however. And trying to say that LNG will drive up the price of US natural gas is completely ignoring the fact of the studies showing where our natural gas is located, in extremely hard to get at places which will drive the price of US natural gas UP, even if environmentalist allow that natural gas to be tapped.
Each study that these so called environmentalists refer to they only tell half the story. They refer to the ODE study as their holy grail that LNG isn’t needed in Oregon without referring to the FACT that ODE says it isn’t needed because 146 nuclear plants are to be built. They don’t want consumers to focus on that because these same “environmentalists” have already launched plans to block theses nuclear plants from being built.
They say that we don’t need LNG imported because we can use our own natural gas. They don’t say that this gas is located in national forests & parks where they have already launched plans to block the gas from reaching the market, ever (think blocking referendums initiated by their own organizations like 4-131).
They say we can use alternative sources without mentioning that we already have abandoned windmill farms and solar plants in Oregon and that ALL windmill farms on the columbia gorge have been blocked, wave technology has been attempted twice in the last year with its applications being withdrawn from PUC application process. Although SOlar manufacturers may “flock” to Oregon, because of all the tax cuts we give to corporations in industries backed by “speculators” we currently don’t have the technology to keep these plants in full operation without generous the generous tax cuts and breaks. W/o them, the price of this renewable energy would be exhorbant.
If one didn’t know better one would think this was to keep the dams on the river from being decommissioned and our energy problems at status quo for the benefit of the energy monopoly already strangling our nation.
On Jul 28, 10:07 AM, Country Boy wrote:
What do you think will do more property damage. NSNG/Bradwood 36mile pipeline or one several hundred miles long from Montana?